|
dndxJun 17, 2012
1
氪金狗眼瞎了
|
|
eerieJun 17, 2012
2
RFC 全称是 Request for Comments
所以么?...你懂的 |
|
wong2Jun 17, 2012
3
中文版: http://202.116.1.166/zrb/CN/abstract/abstract168.shtml
|
|
virushuoJun 17, 2012
4
hackernews头条了……
|
|
6
提交到 RFC 被批,被无视都不稀奇。鄙人感叹的是,他们认为这东西该提交,可以放到全地球大庭广众之下被 comment,骨子里可想着真能被认可继而成为标准的那种寡廉鲜耻和理直气壮
|
|
SharedJun 17, 2012
7
>>>
I wonder if they thought about what would happen if Canada, the United States, and the rest of the world adopted this RFC? For example, lets say an entrepreneur develops a new product and wants to have it manufactured by an outsourced company. Searches for it on Google, but thanks to this RFC the results from China either don't show up, or don't load at all. The entrepreneur therefore opts for a manufacturing company in Des Moines, Iowa. I guess perhaps the same could happen if only China adopts this RFC, i.e. business people in China who don't know better launch their website on a Chinese only DNS system and wonder why nobody from the rest of the world calls them. <<< 这人说得很有道理。闭关锁国,这么多世纪以来就这条传承的最好…… |
|
sparkloJun 17, 2012
8
big brother is hugging you.
|
|
sunusJun 17, 2012
9
无耻者无畏
|
|
piderManXJun 18, 2012
10
ls +17951
|
|
piderManXJun 18, 2012
11
話說作者有兩人姓 屌? 太牛逼了
|
|
wuxqingJun 18, 2012
12
这些人骨子已经失去骨气,由里到外透出的都是奴性
|
|
caoyueJun 18, 2012
13
吐槽无力啊,有些人总能刷新我们的认知……
|
|
svampireJun 18, 2012
14
真是无下限
|
|
jewforiceJul 19, 2013
15
这个是最新更新的,作者一栏把单位去掉了……
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-diao-aip-dns-03.txt |